The Minority in Parliament says Education Minister Dr. Yaw Osei Adutwum’s claims that the government descion to scrap the Basic Certificate Examination as part of education reforms raise serious concerns about the purpose of the yet-to-be-seen FSHS Bill, which was originally announced by the Majority Leader, Alexander Afenyo-Markins.
Majority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin had told the media through the Parliamentary Press Corps that the bill had already received approval from the Cabinet and that its purpose was to compel successive governments to implement the policy.
However, it has emerged through an interview that the Education Administration granted the Daily Graphic that the bill was yet to be submitted to Cabinet and approved.
He had also accused the Minority of opposing the free SHS bill, which they denied, insisting that they had yet to see the bill.
Following the new information provided by the Education Minister, the Minority, through a statement issued by Deputy Ranking on the Education Committee Dr. Clement Apaak, said it appears the Majority Leader lied if the claims made by the Education Minister were true.
The statement said the bill, in its original form, is not seeking to protect the policy as earlier announced but to reform the entire pre-tertiary sector.
“The Majority Leader indicated to the media and on the floor of Parliament that the proposed bill had already received cabinet approval, and was in transition to Parliament. To put it bluntly, if we are to believe the Minister for Education, then we must logically conclude that the Majority Leader deliberately misinformed Ghanaians [ see graphic.com.gh/news/general-n… ].
Secondly, a close scrutiny of the report attributed to the Minister for Education by the Daily Graphic suggests that the purpose of the proposed bill is not to protect the FSHS Programme in its current form and to ensure that successive governments continue to implement the policy in the current manner as suggested by the Majority Leader.”
He underlined that the Minority’s primary concern has been for the government to take action to resolve the myriad issues confronting the policy.
“Our concern has been and remains the implementation challenges: inadequate academic and residential infrastructure; inadequate furniture; inadequate and poor quality food; erratic academic calendar; obnoxious double track system among others. And we will continue pointing out these implementation challenges with the hope that they will be fixed.
Let those who continue peddling lies about our position on FSHS know, that Ghanaians know the truth. And Ghanaians will not fall for the stale and discredited lie that John Dramani Mahama and the NDC are opposed to FSHS.”
Read the full statement below
Statement: Who Is Telling The Truth About The Proposed FSHS Bill
July 2nd, 2024
If the content of the July 1st, 2024 Daily Graphic front page story, attributed to the Minister for Education, titled “Free SHS Bill Goes to Cabinet: Seeks Cancellation of BECE for SHS Admission – SHS to be 6 Years, is indeed true, then, it raises serious questions with regards to the purpose of the yet-to-be-seen FSHS Bill as originally announced by the Majority Leader, Alexander Afenyo-Markins.
Firstly, the revelation by Hon. Yaw Adutwum, the Minister for Education, that the proposed FSHS Bill is yet to go to cabinet, is in direct opposition to the announcement made by the Majority Leader on 11th and 27th of June 2024 respectively.
The Majority Leader indicated to the media and on the floor of Parliament that the proposed bill had already received cabinet approval, and was in transition to Parliament. To put it bluntly, if we are to believe the Minister for Education, then we must logically conclude that the Majority Leader deliberately misinformed Ghanaians [ see graphic.com.gh/news/general-n… ].
Secondly, a close scrutiny of the report attributed to the Minister for Education by the Daily Graphic suggests that the purpose of the proposed bill is not to protect the FSHS Programme in its current form and to ensure that successive governments continue to implement the policy in the current manner as suggested by the Majority Leader.
While we wait for the proposed bill, it is obvious from the report by the Minister for Education, that it is more of a bill seeking to review, restructure and redefine aspects of our Pre-tertiary educational system rather than protect the FSHS in its current form.
Removing BECE and combining JHS and SHS into a 6 year secondary system, is a major undertaking that should require a serious national stakeholders dialogue. Sadly, no consultations have been carried out. And there is no indication of input from key stakeholders in the educational space as far as we know.
Given the apparent contradictions between what the Majority Leader and the Minister for Education have said, with regards to the proposed bill, we must not and can not discuss the purposed bill any further until we see it and study its contents.
Our position as a party and a Caucus remains the same. Any bill or legislation intended to address the FSHS policy implementation challenges, and to make the programme sustainable, is welcome. Let us restate, that John Dramani Mahama and the NDC believe that the FSHS policy is a good policy and do not hate it as some in the NPP falsely claim. How can we not like a policy we began implementing in 2015?
Our concern has been and remains the implementation challenges: inadequate academic and residential infrastructure; inadequate furniture; inadequate and poor quality food; erratic academic calendar; obnoxious double track system among others. And we will continue pointing out these implementation challenges with the hope that they will be fixed.
Let those who continue peddling lies about our position on FSHS know, that Ghanaians know the truth. And Ghanaians will not fall for the stale and discredited lie that John Dramani Mahama and the NDC are opposed to FSHS.
Singed
Dr. Clement Apaak
MP, Builsa South; Deputy Ranking Member on Education Committee of Parliament
By: Rainbowradioonline.com/Ghana
